Tree 1 — taxonomy, not a completed molecular phylogeny
This outline shows genus membership and several named species, NOT a resolved branching order. Recent phylogenetic work challenges traditional Atyidae groups.
Atyidae (freshwater shrimp family)
|-- Neocaridina (Kubo, 1938)
| |-- N. davidi [red/blue/orange/yellow trade lines]
| +-- N. denticulata [different named species]
+-- Caridina (H. Milne Edwards, 1837)
|-- C. logemanni [Bee shrimp]
|-- C. mariae [Tiger shrimp]
|-- C. conghuensis [2014 description]
|-- C. dennerli [Lake Matano endemic]
+-- C. multidentata [Amano shrimp]
(Indentation is categorical, not a DNA branching topology.)Tree 2 — reported hobby breeding routes
These arrows indicate selective breeding or reported crossings, and DO NOT authenticate a particular colony or establish a common global founder.
Neocaridina davidi (wild-type ancestry)
|-- selected red families -> Red Cherry -> Sakura / Fire / Painted Fire
| +-> Red Rili -> Blue Jelly (reported in some stock)
|-- selected dark families -> Chocolate / Black Rose / Carbon Rili
| +-> Blue Dream / Blue Diamond (claimed paths vary)
+-- other selected families -> Yellow / Orange / Green (independent histories)
Caridina ornamental breeding complexes
|-- Bee selections (logemanni-related) -> Crystal Black / Crystal Red / PRL
|-- Tiger selections (mariae-related) -> Tiger color/eye variants
+-- Bee x Tiger = Tibee [IF actual parents documented]
+-> crosses with Taiwan Bee = TaiTibee [breeder term]
+-> Pinto / Galaxy / Fishbone / Boa [multiple possible routes]
Separate wild groups: C. dennerli, C. multidentata: NOT in this designer tree.Tree 3 — evidence and inheritance
Parent stock authentication -> labeled paired mating -> F1 phenotype counts -> replicated F2/backcross counts -> genotype/locus assay -> independent replication. A 3:1 Mendelian phenotype expectation only applies to an adequately established single-locus dominant/recessive model; market color names alone do not meet that condition.