Back to Shrimpapedia

SHRIMPAPEDIA / EX-SITU BREEDING EVIDENCE

Gene Tree 12.0 — Sulawesi captivity and measured survival versus parentage

Four illustrated parallel evidence classes: experiment, breeder report, colony crash, transport; no invented genetic cross.

Picture-style Gene Tree 12.0

Each cohort is a separate experimental or first-person breeding record. They are not parents in a cross or a species phylogeny.2025 DENNERLI TRIALpellets + Hydrilla reported best survival72.727% / n missing2023 BREEDER'S RECOLLECTIONPeter Baert's Cardinal and spinata colonies~20→~300 / ~10→~100; not scored young2022 TANK FAILUREsame keeper's two populationsapproximately 90% loss; cause unknown2019 LAKE LINDU KAILI20 days after two transport journeys88% versus 67% survival; not breedingParallel source studies, not a documented mother/father genotype tree.

What is known

The Cardinal shrimp controlled study reports 72.727% survival for pellet + Hydrilla, while an identified breeder reports approximately 20→300 Cardinal and 10→100 spinata animals. Their methods, times and denominators are not comparable.

What remains missing

No source here discloses a sequence of sexed mother and father breeding pairs, color-marker genotypes, controlled F1/F2 cohort censuses, or proven interspecies crosses. Dashed pedigree branches are therefore explicitly UNKNOWN.

Why a Lake Lindu shrimp is different

Herjayanto et al. studied C. kaili in cooler Lake Lindu inlet stream environments and documented survival after transportation. That is neither juvenile breeding output nor a model for warm Lake Matano Cardinal shrimp.

Primary source ledger