← Medakapedia

AQUAPEDIA / MEDAKA FEEDING

Medaka nutrition atlas

A practical, referenced comparison of live prey and prepared foods. Evidence quality, life stage, nutritional balance and water quality come before brand promises.

PRIMARY EVIDENCE / BATCH 4

Species-specific correction and primary medaka studies

Corrected evidence note: the 2022 medaka custom-regimen allocation was 50% flakes plus 50% live Artemia; beef-liver paste was given to adult platyfish in the same cross-species study. The historical U.S. EPA manual and a broodstock fatty-acid experiment also show why prey size, hatch rates and seven-day survival need separate assessment. Original study methods ↗ · Read corrected US feeding research →

ADDITIONAL JAPANESE MEDAKA FOODS

Tetra, Sudo, Nichido and Comet

Compare 21 named formulas ↗

Original Japanese maker catalogues: 6 Tetra, 4 Sudo, 7 Nichido and 4 Comet / Itosui entries. See life stages, granule sizes, available guaranteed analyses and source limitations. No independent brand winner or verified US sales ranking.

UNITED STATES / KEEPER REPORTS

Food choices among U.S.-market keepers

Read source-qualified observations ↗

14 food and culture observations: powder grades, Hikari First Bites, Golden Pearls, U.S. retailer formulas and clean live prey. This is not a popularity ranking.

EVIDENCE-FIRST RESEARCH

Choose a research collection

EVIDENCE-FIRST RESEARCH

What controlled medaka studies actually tested

In a 1992 study, casein-based feed and a flake-plus-Artemia diet performed adequately, but a flake-only diet did not; spinal deformities occurred in 5.4% of fish on the flake-plus-Artemia diet. Species-level 2022 methods correction: medaka received a 50% flake plus 50% live Artemia custom diet; beef-liver paste was part of the adult platyfish regimen, not the medaka ration. Comparative findings do not isolate Artemia effects.

DeKoven et al. 1992 ↗ · Russo et al. 2022 ↗