Back to Shrimpapedia

SHRIMPAPEDIA / SCIENTIFIC IDENTITY / OCT 2026

Neocaridina denticulata sinensis — historical identification — evidence review

Morph C was compared with this taxon in the 2024 Chinese mitogenome paper, with A/B/C morphs from one drainage.

Original evidence / species identification

Morph C was compared with this taxon in the 2024 Chinese mitogenome paper, with A/B/C morphs from one drainage.

Illustrated research / ancestry evidence

Scientific evidence for Neocaridina denticulata sinensis — historical identification; ornamental breeder parents are undocumented and disconnected.PUBLISHED SCIENTIFIC NAMENeocaridina denticulata sinensis —historical identificationINDEPENDENT STUDIES2024 / 2025 published scientificevidenceCOMMERCIAL BREEDER PARENT IDSNOT DOCUMENTED
Solid = sourced taxonomic name and studies. Unknown commercial parentage has no crossing arrow. Scientific sources cannot establish a molecular ornamental color gene.

Other taxonomic treatments

Yang et al. proposed wide species merger; their phylogeny and taxonomy are research hypotheses.

Contradictions and unresolved claims

Study tissue/genome markers don't establish Cherry/Sakura strain dominance in aquarium stocks.

Ecological and breeder-pedigree limits

A historical scientific name and morph treatment, not a defined color-line founder.

Recorded commercial founders

Not documented in cited field taxonomy

Published, counted named-color F1/F2 ratios

No controlled commercial color F1/F2 segregation table in cited source

Primary scientific and database references